Home Page About Me My Blog Radio Work Photographs Links Link to Facebook Twitter Flickr Last.FM RSS Feeds



Sunday, April 11th, 2010

I enjoy reading newspapers and blogs far more than I enjoy reading books. Now I’m going to start sharing some of the articles I have enjoyed in a weekly blog post. It’s an idea I’ve nicked straight from James Cridland’s blog. Clicking on any link should open it up in a new window or tab, so get clicking.

The Digital Economy Bill was quickly passed through during the week with seemingly little thought put towards it. I often wonder if Peter Mandelson has ever used the internet?  If you’d like a quick run through of what this all means, Robert Andrews of paidContent:UK has given us this “Quick Guide To All 45 Measures“.

I don’t think any of us have escaped the news that this week the Queen dissolved parliament and Gordon announced a General Election.  This election will be the first proper social media election, and spreading like wildfire through Twitter this week were images from the website mydavidcameron.com, Photoshopping at it’s best.

In the week that Apple announced their latest update for the iPhone, Os4, Gizmodo report “How The iPhone Could End Up In Second Place“.  It’s a worthwhile article for any company that’s thinking about developing solely for the iPhone platform.

The Guardian is one of my most visited websites. It quite often holds the crown of being my web browsers homepage.

Their article “Spare a Flickr of sympathy for professional photographers” makes interesting reading.  In it it states that the popular photo sharing site now features billions of pictures by amateurs and squeezing income out of the photographic industry. I suppose I fall under the category of the photographer who owes everything to the easy shoot digital camera. But like every industry, times are a changing, and professional photographers need to get with the them.

It could be an interesting year for Bebo users. AOL want to either shutdown or sell the Social Networking site.  For me Bebo, in 2005, was the first site of it’s type which had proper mainstream appeal.  But it lost out to Facebook. Feature wise, privacy wise, and design wise, it was way out of the league of Facebook. I deleted my Bebo profile a long time ago. Most people I know now use Facebook.

What I’ve learned this week.  If you have the opportunity to name a ship, don’t name it Titanic. Surely that one was obvious? And if you are going to put your old redundant suitcases to a charity shop, check inside them before you let them go. And 2000 years after he rose from the dead, Jesus has decided to come back in a piece of chewing gum.  That story particularly got my goat.

If like me your a radio presenter who every now and again needs content for a quick link, the Daily Telegraph’s “How About That” section is an excellent resource.  And speaking of local radio presenters, back to the Guardian, “What I’m really thinking: The local radio presenter“. It’s all true.

The excellent Flight Level 390 blog continues to keep me longing to leave radio and become an airline pilot, while GERT on Blipfoto.com continues to keep me longing to leave radio, skip the idea of an airline pilot and get a job on the high seas instead.

So much reading, so little time. Thankfully Google Reader keeps it all in one place for me. Same time, same place, next week for more.


Friday, April 9th, 2010

I’m going on about this like a stuck record, but it’s something I feel strongly about.

I was in a meeting at work the other day. The subject of the meeting was streaming formats, bitrates and accessibility to these streams. The usual boring work related subjects.  Along came the topic of mobile listening.  Asked by someone in the meeting “Do you own an IPhone David?” the answer was “no, no I don’t.”  And just like that, almost instantly, I was dismissed as having any sort of knowledgeable viewpoint or understanding of mobiles, streaming and their future.

Trying to bring to the meeting the idea that media organisations shouldn’t just concentrate on iPhone development, but multi platform support, bringing in devices such as Android and Blackberry was almost frowned upon, because it wasn’t the latest ‘in craze’, the iPhone.

Thinking about it afterwards, I should have said yes to the question posed to me. While I don’t own an actual iPhone,  it would seem that the term ‘ iPhone’ has become an umbrella term for anything smart phone like, and I do own an smart phone, a much smarter phone than an iPhone in my opinion. In pretty much in the same way that I own a Hoover, well I don’t, I own a Dyson, and the Tannoy system in our school was actually made by Panasonic, therefore it wasn’t Tannoy at all because Tannoy is a brand name of Sony.

I know a lot of people who love technology, love media, and quite often show me the ‘latest amazing thing’ that their iPhone can do. If I try and do the same with my Android phone I’m ignored because it’s not an iPhone.

With Apple releasing details of their latest iPhone OS4.0, news outlets like the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph and loads more are all over the story. I like these newspapers, but sometimes their over biased coverage of Apple products amaze me. And this is why your bog standard punter doesn’t know or like anything other than the iPhone, because Apple get so much coverage and the mainstream media are not at all interested in anything else.

This isn’t a dig at anyone I work with. It’s not a dig on iPhone users. It’s a dig on the general ignorance and perception of iPhone’s as a whole. Don’t get me wrong, there’s some things Apple and the iPhone do far superior than my Google Android phone. Brilliant marketing, seamless integration with your computer, well timed regular software updates and the games and graphics on an iPhone is far superior to any other phone I’ve seen .  But we shouldn’t put all our development eggs in one iPhone shaped basket. Once the iPhone app is ready we shouldn’t just sit back and rub our hands with glee because we have an fancy pants  iPhone app, because if we do that, we are alienating A LOT of people.

The future of mobiles isn’t the iPhone. It will play a large part of the future, but so will Android, Symbian, Blackberry, WebOS, Meemo and who knows what else as time goes by.


Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

There’s no denying. Apple IPhones are very popular. Every 2nd person seems to have one. So quite rightly when a company, an organisation, an individual, whoever, decide that they want a mobile application (or app as they have now been abbreviated to) they quite rightly decide to make their app for the IPhone.

While it’s unlikely that one make or model of phone is going to overtake Apple’s domination of the market any time soon, I can see it being highly likely that in a year or so from now Google’s Android operating system will have taken the lead on the number of devices it’s installed on.

Google announced this week that Android is now available on 27 models of phone, and this number is only going to grow.

Anyone who has used the Android OS can tell you that it’s as good as the IPhone, and with it’s ability to multi task and less restrictive over what can be installed, it has many advantages over Apples system. What’s stopping it at the moment is the lack of apps compared to the IPhone.

So if you are a developer of mobile apps at the moment, while you may be tempted to develop solely for the IPhone, I’d also seriously consider making an app for Android as well. Because in a years time I personally believe that Apple are going to have a serious competitor on their hands.

I’ve started learning Java with the aim of trying to get my head around making Android appications. Maybe within a year, when I believe my Android prediction to come true, I will be ready to release an app.

Of course I say all this being an Android fanboy. I’m biased. I want to see it do well. If you’re developing a mobile application and you want it to get the highest possible user base then really you should still be developing for Symbian (found on most Nokia phones) who accounted for 50% of the OS’s installed on mobile phones sold in Q2 of 2009, compared to only 12% for the IPhone OS and only 2.8% for Android.

[Update: 17/02/10] Some interesting statistics on this article here.  Apparently 60,000 phones  a day ship with the Android OS. That’s 21.9 million a year.  Apple shipped 8.7 million IPhones in the last quarter, or 34.8 million a year.  The gap is closing.


Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

The Apple IPhone 3GS

I’m a bit of a geek when it comes to new phones. The purchasing of a new phone is always an exciting moment for me. I think it’s fair to say that I get way too excited about the prospect of one. With an upgrade due at the beginning of August I’m already beginning to twitch ever so slightly at this thought.

And with a new IPhone hotly rumoured, I spent 2 hours watching Apple’s WWDC conference yesterday evening to see what tricks they would have up their sleeves. 2 whole hours. We had talk about new laptops (or Macbooks as they call them), new operating systems, yadda yadda yadda (I’m not an Apple Mac computer fan). And then we got to the bit I (and mostly everyone else was waiting for), talk of a new IPhone. With an upgrade inimant I’m keeping my options open, and one of those options is an IPhone.

Here’s some key points and my understanding of the new Apple IPhone 3GS. ‘S’ stands for ‘speed’ don’t you know.

A 3 mega pixel camera – my Sony Ericsson of 3 years ago had a 3 mega pixel camera on it. My current phone has 5.

Voice control – if I say “call Emma” it will call Emma. If I say “call Emma” at 3 in the morning after a night out it will probably call my boss by accident.  A nice thought, but my Sony Ericsson of 5 years ago had this same feature. I remember impressing people with it in our common area at school. These voice controlled systems don’t like my half Scottish half Shetland accent anyway.

MMS picture messaging – 5 year old phone had that. The novelty wore off quickly.

Video recording – Most people have had this feature on their phones for a good few years now.  And lets all be honest, it’s not that good.

Tethering – Apple have coined an idea a phrase for a feature that at a premium allows you to connect your IPhone to your computer and use the Internet through your IPhone.  Did you know my phone of 5 years ago could do that?

There’s a ‘locate me‘ me option where if you lose your phone you can pinpoint it on a map on your computer screen. I like that idea, but presumably that would require the phone to have a GPS position which anyone who’s ever played with their GPS unit will know that it is not too accurate indoors. The computer wont tell me that my phone is underneath that pile of papers on my desk.

Essentially the IPhone is full of basic features wrapped up in great marketing by Apple. There are many phones out at the moment that whip the IPhone in terms of what they can do.

So with that in mind, do I want an IPhone? Yes… Yes I do.

Why? Well, the IPhone has something that I’ve yet to see any other phone compare with, it’s interface. The operating system it runs in seamless. If Nokia could create an interface as nice as that then they would be on to a winner. It’s this alone that makes a pretty basic phone into a must have object for anyone.  Mutton dressed as lamb I believe is the phrase.

Will I buy an IPhone? Probably not. For one reason only.

The price . A quick look at O2′s tariffs for the new IPhone shows on the 18 month £34.26 plan which gives you unlimited data, 600 minutes and 500 texts (which is probably the average plan for most normal users, it’s certainly the plan I’d go for) your looking at a cost of £184.96 for the 16GB version of the handset.  18 x £34.26 + £184.96 = £801.64. Holy smoke! Over 800 quid for a new phone.  And O2 have an exclusive deal with Apple to sell the IPhone in the UK.  So no competition. They can price it whatever way they want.

It wouldn’t be too bad if for that price I got a full 18 months out of it, but I wont. Because you cant unlock the IPhone. It comes as an O2 phone. It will always be an O2 phone. Unless you jailbreak it, which funnily enough invalidates the warranty.  We’re planning to go to Canada for a year next summer. I would want to use a Canadian SIM in it. You can’t.  Nokia phones on Vodafone come unlocked as standard, a Canadian sim would work.

So it looks like no IPhone for me this summer.  Other options. Well there is the HTC Magic. More commonly known as the Google phone. Syncs beautifully with Google Mail, Calenders etc. Runs the Google Android software too which is the closest yet to the IPhone OS. The camera is alright and it’s specs don’t look too bad, but there is no headphone socket. So that’s no straight away. I want something I can use as an MP3 player with my headphones I already own.

Nokia’s new flagship phone is launched in a couple of weeks, the Nokia N97. A pull out QWERTY keyboard, 5 mega pixel camera, decent specs, a HEADPHONE socket, FM receiver and transmitter. Looks promising however its operating system lacks the smoothness and style of the IPhone or the Google phone.  First reviews of the N97 all seem to suggest that it’s lacking something.

Nokia N97

And finally there’s the Palm Pre. Dubbed by many as the real IPhone killer. Launched in the States this week. Launches in the UK in November. We can rule that one out straight away, like I said at the beginning of this geeky blog post, I love new phones and seriously I can’t wait 5 months for a new one.

Gah, it’s a tough life.