Home Page About Me My Blog Radio Work Photographs Links Link to Facebook Twitter Flickr Last.FM RSS Feeds



Sunday, February 28th, 2010

I saw this this morning over on James Cridland’s blog.  Combines two, if used well, amazing techniques.  Tilt-shifting and time lapse photography to create a video of New York at work and at play.  But it’s neither the tilt-shift or the the time-lapse that does it for me, it’s the timing of the music and the visuals.


The Sandpit from Sam O’Hare on Vimeo.

I tried my hand at creating a tilt-shift photo a few years back.

I could spend a good few hours browsing through the tilt-shift group on Flickr. But I have things to be getting on with.


Thursday, February 18th, 2010

On Wednesday morning, the day after pancake day and the first day me lent, I decided I would give up Coca Cola.

I thought maybe there was something better I could give up, like exercise or vegetables, but after much deliberation, and a call from a listener to my radio show to tell me that drinking Coca Cola will increase your risk of cancer, I was decided… coke it was.

A couple of days in and I am already struggling. I’ve not given in yet, but as a colleague drank a nice, cool, refreshing can of coke today, I was sorely tempted.

I’ve given up coke before. One new year. I lasted 3 days. This time round I have Emma for support. She incidentally is giving up chocolate.

So that is it. No coke till Easter Sunday. I’m officially a coke addict who has gone cold turkey.

I will report back.

David


Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

There’s no denying. Apple IPhones are very popular. Every 2nd person seems to have one. So quite rightly when a company, an organisation, an individual, whoever, decide that they want a mobile application (or app as they have now been abbreviated to) they quite rightly decide to make their app for the IPhone.

While it’s unlikely that one make or model of phone is going to overtake Apple’s domination of the market any time soon, I can see it being highly likely that in a year or so from now Google’s Android operating system will have taken the lead on the number of devices it’s installed on.

Google announced this week that Android is now available on 27 models of phone, and this number is only going to grow.

Anyone who has used the Android OS can tell you that it’s as good as the IPhone, and with it’s ability to multi task and less restrictive over what can be installed, it has many advantages over Apples system. What’s stopping it at the moment is the lack of apps compared to the IPhone.

So if you are a developer of mobile apps at the moment, while you may be tempted to develop solely for the IPhone, I’d also seriously consider making an app for Android as well. Because in a years time I personally believe that Apple are going to have a serious competitor on their hands.

I’ve started learning Java with the aim of trying to get my head around making Android appications. Maybe within a year, when I believe my Android prediction to come true, I will be ready to release an app.

Of course I say all this being an Android fanboy. I’m biased. I want to see it do well. If you’re developing a mobile application and you want it to get the highest possible user base then really you should still be developing for Symbian (found on most Nokia phones) who accounted for 50% of the OS’s installed on mobile phones sold in Q2 of 2009, compared to only 12% for the IPhone OS and only 2.8% for Android.

[Update: 17/02/10] Some interesting statistics on this article here.  Apparently 60,000 phones  a day ship with the Android OS. That’s 21.9 million a year.  Apple shipped 8.7 million IPhones in the last quarter, or 34.8 million a year.  The gap is closing.


Thursday, February 11th, 2010

There are 3 of us

People often say to me “David, how do you achieve so much with only 24 hours in a day?” or “David, you’re so great, how do you find time to do everything”… ok, no one ever says that to me, but if they did I’d say “because there are actually 3 of me, rotating around on a regular basis”.

And here’s a photo to prove it. Hard at work.

Either that or I remembered yesterday how to do something that someone once showed me in Photoshop. Involving layers and the eraser tool. Yes, that’s probably it.


Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

I’ve always been a fan of Google. You probably know that by now. I use their search engine. I use their browser. I use their phone. I use their email. I even have my work in Google thanks to some clever Microsoft Exchange filters. Anyone who sends me a text message appears in my Google Mail. I use their maps. I’ve blogged about it all in the past. So it would only be right to blog about their latest invention.

Out of the blue, out of nowhere, last night came Google Buzz. It’s billed as some sort of cross between Facebook, Twitter and Google Mail. Think email meets social networking. You’re confused aren’t you? I am. I like it’s idea… I think. I’m just not entirely sure what it’s for. And I think a lot of people are thinking the same.

Buzz is a new tab in my Google inbox. And I have my Google inbox open all day every day. Whenever I’m at a computer, my Google inbox is there. And so is Buzz now. All of my contacts in Google are now also there. That includes friends, colleagues and acquaintances. My Google Buzz is closely linked to my Twitter, Flickr and this blog. I make a post on one, and appears in my Buzz. I can also make individual buzzes separate from any other service. And then any of my Google contacts can then make a comment on that buzz, whatever it may be.

What Buzz seems to good at is geo-tagged buzzes (is buzzes the collective term we’re going with by the way?) Google actively encourage you to include your location on your buzzes, so people around you know what’s going on near you. Location aware social network is going to take off massively this year. Twitter is already allowing you to geo tag tweets. Mobile phones with internet access and GPS devices are pretty common, it makes sense to combine the two to give a better localised experience for all.

Will I use it more than I use Twitter? Probably not. But then my Twitter account lay almost dormant, updated once a month at best for its first 12 months. Same with my Facebook. There’s a chance the same could happen with Google Buzz.

What I’d like is a service that all my social network posts, whether it be Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Last.FM, Buzz, Picasa, YouTube, Wordpress are all linked in as one. Some websites already offer services like that, but I’d quite like it to be handily in my Google inbox, and while Buzz gets very close to that, it just doesn’t quite seem to do it… yet.

But it’s still early days. I will be watching and participating with interest.

Tweet was the social media buzz word of 2009, will Buzz be the same for 2010?